Andrew Watson vs Jack Findel-Hawkins Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W L W L W L L
Form
L W W L L W L W W LHead To Head: Watson 1 - 1 Findel-Hawkins
They have played 6 sets in total, with Watson winning 3 and Findel-Hawkins winning 3. The last match between Watson and Findel-Hawkins was at the M25 Dublin, 02-08-2019, Quarterfinals, Carpet with Andrew Watson getting the victory 4-6 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Andrew Watson | 1 |
| Jack Findel-Hawkins | 1 |
M25 Dublin(02-08-2019)
4
6
6
4
6
4
| Watson | Stats | Findel-Hawkins |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 535 | Highest Rank | 635 |
| 28 | Age | 30 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 67% (121-60) | Career Total W/L | 59% (70-49) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Tiafoe VS Darderi PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Pegula VS Uchijima PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Watson VS Findel-Hawkins H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Andrew Watson
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
60%
(
51 of
85)
1st Serve %
49%
(
44 of
89)
6
Aces
11
10
Double Faults
5
82%
(
42 of
51)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
35 of
44)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
26 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
83
|
||||
| 6-7(1) 6-2 7-6(5) |
Stats
Jack Findel-Hawkins
Player
Andrew Watson
65%
(
60 of
92)
1st Serve %
57%
(
64 of
112)
15
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
7
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
47 of
64)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
25 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
40 of
112)
107
Total Points Won
97
|
||||
Watson VS Findel-Hawkins H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 31 | Games Won | 33 |
| 15 | Aces (Total) | 26 |
| 17 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 2:18:0 | Average Match Time | 2:18:0 |
| 58% (115/197) | 1st Serve % | 57% (104/181) |
| 77% (89/115) | 1st Serve Win % | 80% (83/104) |
| 51% (42/82) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (41/77) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 26% (5/19) |
| 31% (57/181) | Return Points Win % | 34% (66/197) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Andrew Watson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Andrew Watson
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Adrian Andreev
Player
Andrew Watson
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrew Watson
Player
Zane Khan
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
41%
(
15 of
37)
12
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
53
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Andrew Watson
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrew Watson
Player
Grey Hamilton
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve %
43%
(
20 of
46)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
14 of
20)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anton Matusevich
Player
Andrew Watson
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
67%
(
64 of
96)
6
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
6
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
68%
(
25 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
32%
(
27 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
96)
93
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ryan Peniston
Player
Andrew Watson
63%
(
56 of
89)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
101)
5
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
10
86%
(
48 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
27%
(
9 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
32 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
101)
96
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andrew Watson
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
60%
(
51 of
85)
1st Serve %
49%
(
44 of
89)
6
Aces
11
10
Double Faults
5
82%
(
42 of
51)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
35 of
44)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
26 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Jack Findel-Hawkins Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
7
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jack Findel-Hawkins
Player
Martins Rocens
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
62)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
8
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Findel-Hawkins
Player
Daniel Labrador
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
49%
(
22 of
45)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kyle Seelig
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
84%
(
49 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
0
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
24 of
47)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Lebedev
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
7
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Milan Welte
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67% (121/60) | Win/Loss | 59% (70/49) |
| 63% (259/152) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (154/118) |
| 55% (2103/1693) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (1400/1276) |
| 65% (53/29) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (26/19) |
| 73% (45/17) | Clay Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) |
| 61% (17/11) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62% (32/20) |
| 67% (6/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 63% (10/6) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.33 |
| 409 | Aces Total | 426 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 402 | Total Double Faults | 353 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:3:11 |
| 378.51 | Average Opponent Rank | 450.05 |
| 62% (4213/6801) | 1st Serve % | 60% (3349/5542) |
| 69% (2905/4213) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (2442/3349) |
| 49% (1277/2588) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (1078/2193) |
| 40% (298/751) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (187/466) |
| 41% (2826/6929) | Return Points Win % | 37% (2041/5472) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (1/2) | Challenger W/L | 50% (2/2) |
| 68% (120/57) | Futures W/L | 59% (68/47) |
| 66% (119/179) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (69/117) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 58% (30/52) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (27/50) |
| 62% (32/52) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (21/36) |
| 91% (115/105) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (66/56) |
| 9% (115/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (66/10) |
| 23% (65/15) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (52/13) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
